Bimbo Bakeries USA · Class project

Buttery: Breakfast Subscription

A research-led breakfast subscription proposal for Bimbo Bakeries USA, developed from nine participant sessions in a three-person class project.

Secondary researchParticipatory researchResearch synthesisConcept development
3Team members

Shared responsibility across research and design

4Market trends

Used to shape the primary research plan

3Research methods

Interview, observation, and projective activities

9Participant sessions

Three sessions conducted by each teammate

Team & Contributions

Team members: Yaxuan Xiao, Henry Yang, and Jinheng Cen. We shared the research and design work evenly.

  • Conducted secondary research into breakfast habits and market trends
  • I recruited participants and conducted three of the team's nine research sessions
  • Synthesized findings and developed concepts together
  • Created the final presentation and presented it to the client as a team
  • My additional work: I coordinated meeting times, milestones, and task handoffs to keep the team aligned.

Client Need

How might Bimbo Bakeries USA increase breakfast and bread-and-bun purchases among adults ages 18–35?

The brief focused on making products in Bimbo Bakeries USA's breakfast and bread-and-buns categories more relevant to younger consumers.

Before creating a product, we needed to understand how this age group eats, shops, and makes decisions within the constraints of everyday life.

01 · Secondary Research

Four trends shaped what we needed to learn from people.

We studied shifts in food formats, convenience, health, indulgence, and flavor to form an initial view of younger consumers' expectations.

01

Smaller sizes

More customers prefer mini-sized baked goods and snacks.

02

Convenience

Convenience is increasingly important when Gen Z selects food.

03

Health and indulgence

Health awareness and food indulgence coexist among younger consumers.

04

Bolder flavors

Customers seek more stimulating and distinctive snack flavors.

02 · Session Design & Recruitment

We designed three activities to learn through talking, observing, and doing.

Each 90-minute session combined direct questions with evidence from participants' environments and a creative exercise about their ideal snack.

50 min

Interview

Discuss routines, motivations, constraints, and food-purchase decisions.

20 min

Observation

Photograph food cabinets and ask participants about what they keep within reach.

20 min

Projective exercise

Ask participants to draw an ideal snack and express needs beyond direct answers.

03 · Conduct Sessions & Collect Evidence

Nine sessions connected participants' stories to their real environments.

We documented what participants told us, photographed their food cabinets during observation, and collected drawings from the projective exercise. These three forms of evidence helped us compare intentions with everyday behavior.

9participants

All currently living in the United States

18–35target age range

Focused on younger breakfast consumers

U.S.current residence

Required for every recruited participant

User Insights

01

Limited access

Without time, transportation, or nearby variety, breakfast options narrow quickly.

02

On-the-go eating

Breakfast often happens during class, work, or a commute.

03

Safe exploration

People want novelty without committing to a full package or unfamiliar flavor.

04

Portion sensitivity

Portion needs change with schedule, appetite, and health goals.

05

Emotional value

Baked goods can provide comfort, reward, and social connection.

04 · Find the Opportunity

We organized the evidence to find gaps between needs and existing choices.

We transferred session notes into post-its, grouped related ideas, and mapped the patterns through a 2×2 framework and a Venn diagram.

Two by two synthesis mapping functional fuel, emotional support, control, and choice.
Functional performance was expected. Differentiation came from emotional value and low-effort control.
Venn diagram connecting habitual, social, and emotional breakfast needs.
The overlap pointed to familiar routines, flexible personalization, and enough novelty to sustain interest.
How might we design an accessible, convenient, and varied breakfast experience that fits young adults' morning routines?

05 · Ideate & Refine

Our first three concepts explored emotion but did not solve the underlying routine.

Sketch of a baked-goods package that changes expression as portions are removed.
Growth BitesAn interactive package whose expression changes as the food is eaten.
Sketch of a weekday baked-goods set with a different flavor for each day.
Daily BitesA weekday set that introduces a changing baked-good flavor each day.
Sketch of a snack package designed to respond to anger through writing, smashing, or eating.
Rage BiteAn expressive snack package that turns frustration into a playful interaction.

Why We Revisited the Direction

The first concepts did not fit how young adults actually navigate breakfast.

We went back to the evidence and rebuilt the idea by combining insights from secondary research with what participants shared in interviews. That synthesis shifted the concept away from expressive packaging and toward a convenient, customizable service designed for young adults' everyday routines.

Final Direction

The proposal moves breakfast planning to a weekly choice.

The final concept is a customizable bread subscription planned once and delivered in individually packaged, ready-to-eat portions.

01

Customize once

Select bread type, flavor, dietary preferences, portion size, and weekly quantity.

02

Deliver reliably

Use scheduled weekly or biweekly delivery to remove the need for a morning stop.

03

Grab and go

Individually packaged portions fit class, work, and commuting routines.

Buttery final concept with customization, delivery, and grab-and-go benefits.
Concept story showing Buttery's customization, preparation, delivery, and grab-and-go features.
Storyboard showing a stressful morning before Buttery and a planned breakfast routine after using the service.
The storyboard moves breakfast planning out of the rushed morning and into a single weekly setup.

Recommendation & open questions

A service hypothesis to test, not demonstrated demand.

Our deliverable was a concept recommendation and presentation to the client. The research supported exploring convenience, variety, and flexible portions; it did not establish that people would subscribe or that delivery would be commercially viable.

Adoption

Would people choose a recurring subscription over supermarket multipacks or ordinary grocery delivery? A next study should compare these alternatives, including price and commitment.

Service feasibility

Freshness, customization, packaging, and delivery cost need evaluation before the service can become a viable recommendation for implementation.

Evidence scope

Nine exploratory sessions informed the concept. They do not establish demand across the full 18–35 age range or demonstrate increased purchases.

Reflection

Revisit the direction when the concept misses the routine.

Our early concepts emphasized expressive packaging. Returning to the research shifted the recommendation toward access, convenience, and everyday routines. That was a useful change in direction, but the subscription model still needs testing against simpler ways to buy breakfast.